Skip to main content
Download PDF

Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline variants in an unselected pancreatic cancer patient cohort in Pakistan

Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice volume 21, Article number: 22 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) are the most frequently investigated genes among Caucasian pancreatic cancer patients, whereas limited reports are available among Asians. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of BRCA1/2 germline variants in Pakistani pancreatic cancer patients.

Methods

One hundred and fifty unselected and prospectively enrolled pancreatic cancer patients were comprehensively screened for BRCA1/2 germline variants using denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography and high-resolution melting analyses, followed by DNA sequencing of the variant fragments. The novel variants were analyzed for their pathogenic effect using in-silico tools. Potentially functional variants were further screened in 200 cancer-free controls.

Results

Protein truncating variant was detected in BRCA2 only, with a prevalence of 0.7% (1/150). A frameshift BRCA2 variant (p.Asp946Ilefs*14) was identified in a 71-year-old male patient of Pathan ethnicity, with a family history of abdominal cancer. Additionally, we found a novel variant in BRCA2 (p.Glu2650Gln), two previously reported variants in BRCA1 (p.Thr293Ser) and BRCA2 (p.Ile2296Leu) and a recurrent nonsense variant in BRCA2 (p.Lys3326Ter). These variants were classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS). It is noteworthy that none of these VUS carriers had a family history of pancreatic or other cancers.

Conclusions

In this first study, BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant is identified with a low frequency in pancreatic cancer patients from Pakistan. Comprehensive multigene panel testing is recommended in the Pakistani pancreatic cancer patients to enhance genetic understanding in this population.

Peer Review reports

Background

Pancreatic cancer is the seventh leading cause of cancer associated mortalities worldwide with a very poor prognosis [1]. In Pakistan, 1162 new pancreatic cancer patients were diagnosed in 2020 and the majority of these patients (97.2%) died within the same year [2]. Therefore, it is clinically important to detect individuals at a high risk of developing pancreatic carcinoma early.

Most pancreatic cancer patients are sporadic. About 10–20% are hereditary pancreatic cancer cases due to known genetic risk factors [3], including the pathogenic variants in cancer predisposing genes [4]. Of these genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) are the most frequently investigated to assess their contribution to pancreatic cancer risk among Caucasians. BRCA1/2 pathogenic germline variants have been reported with a frequency of 0.15 and 0.38% in the general population from the UK and USA, respectively [5]. BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants carriers have approximately 2.5% risk of developing pancreatic cancer by age 80 [6].

The frequency of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants in pancreatic cancer patients varies widely across ethnic groups and geographic regions. Previous studies have primarily focused on Caucasians [7,8,9,10,11], with limited reports among Asians, including studies from China [12], Japan [13, 14], and Korea [15]. Studies conducted on unselected pancreatic cancer patients (with > 100 patient cohorts) are summarized in Additional file 1 [see Additional file 1 Table S1]. To our knowledge, there is no study on the contribution of BRCA1/2 germline pathogenic variants to pancreatic cancer patients in South Asian, including the Pakistani population. Previously, we reported 23.4% prevalence of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants among Pakistani high-risk breast and/or ovarian cancer families [16, 17]. Of the identified variants, several population-specific BRCA1/2 variants have been detected, suggesting founder effects in the Pakistani population [18]. Hence, it is plausible that BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants might also be associated with pancreatic cancer risk in the Pakistani population. The present study aimed to investigate the prevalence of BRCA1/2 pathogenic germline variants among pancreatic cancer patients from Pakistan. This study may help identify important genetic biomarkers in Pakistani pancreatic cancer patients. These population-specific genetic biomarkers could serve as specific targets for prospective diagnosis, prognosis, early-stage detection, and personalized medicine.

Methods

Study subjects

This study included 150 unrelated, consecutive, and unselected pancreatic cancer patients enrolled at the SKMCH&RC Lahore and SKMCH&RC Peshawar, and Bahria International Hospital, Lahore, between February 2017 and October 2021, as previously described [19]. All patients were histologically confirmed with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, or ampullary/periampullary region. All pancreatic cancer patients were tested negative for PALB2 pathogenic variants [19]. The control population included 200 adult individuals (> 18 years) without a personal or family history of any cancer enrolled simultaneously with the cases, as previously described [19]. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre (SKMCH&RC), (Approval # IRB-16-14; December 16, 2016). All study participants signed informed written consent prior to the study enrollment. All data were fully anonymized.

Demographics and potential risk factors data (e.g., age at cancer diagnosis for cases, age at enrollment for controls, ethnic background, history of any medical illness, smoking, drinking habits (tea/coffee/alcohol), physical activity and family history of cancer were obtained from all recruited study participants at the time of enrollment using a purposely designed study questionnaire. Clinical and histopathological data of the patients were collected from medical records and pathology reports, respectively between February 2017 and August 2022.

Molecular analyses

Genomic DNA was extracted from 9 ml to 18 ml of whole blood using the Gentra Puregene kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The complete coding sequences and exon-intron junctions of BRCA1 (Genbank Accession number NM_007294.3) and BRCA2 (Genbank Accession number NM_000059.3) were screened in 150 patients. BRCA1/2 gene scanning was performed by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) and high-resolution melting (HRM) analyses using WAVE 4500 DNA Fragment Analysis System (Transgenomics, Omaha, NE USA) and the LightCycler 480-II System (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA), respectively. Positive controls for each amplicon were included in every analysis. We established a cost-effective and rapid screening HRM assay and successfully validated it for the screening of coding sequences of BRCA1 (47%) and BRCA2 (31%). As positive controls were not identified by HRM analysis for the remaining coding sequences of BRCA1 (53%) and BRCA2 (69%), DHPLC was performed [17].

The identified variants were bi-directionally sequenced using an automated 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City CA, USA). Additionally, all patients were screened for two founder large deletions of BRCA1 exons 1 to 2 and exons 21 to 24, as previously described [20]. The identified pathogenic variant, in silico-predicted likely pathogenic variants, and variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were screened in 200 healthy controls.

In silico analyses

Novel BRCA1/2 variants (n = 11) and previously reported VUS (n = 2) were analyzed using in silico analysis tools. The potential effect of missense variants on protein function was assessed using the default settings of the web tool VarCards, which interprets the pathogenicity of nonsynonymous variants using numerous genomic features and in silico algorithms [21]. The intronic variants were analyzed for their potential effect on splicing using splice prediction tools SpliceSiteFinder-like, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, and GeneSplicer using the Alamut Visual Plus v1.2.1 software (SOPHiA GENETICS) in default settings, as previously described [19].

Variant classification

All identified variants were defined as a novel or previously reported variants by searching the literature and public databases ClinVar (https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/clinvar/), LOVD (https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/genes/BRCA1), and gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/) (by September 2022). All variants were classified as recommended by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) [22]. The publicly available computational web tools Pathogenicity of Mutation Analyzer (PathoMAN) [23] and InterVar [24] were utilized for the variant classification. These tools use 28 various criteria of ACMG/AMP guidelines and result in preliminary interpretations that can be further reviewed and manually adjusted for final interpretations [23, 24].

Results

In total, 393 pancreatic cancer patients were identified eligible for enrollment in this study. Of these, 243 patients were excluded because they were deceased before consent (n = 113), refused to participate in the study (n = 73), or lost to follow-up (n = 57) (Fig. 1). The remaining 150 unselected pancreatic cancer patients were comprehensively screened for BRCA1/2 variants using DHPLC and HRM analyses followed by DNA sequencing. The mean age at pancreatic cancer diagnosis was 55.2 years (range 31.2 to 78.4). The majority of the pancreatic cancer patients were male (106/150; 70.7%). Family history of breast, pancreatic, gastrointestinal, or other cancers was reported in 36% (54/150) of the index pancreatic cancer patients. Majority of these patients presented with tumors in the head of the pancreas (108/150; 72%), 2 to 5 cm of tumor size (108/150; 72%), unresectable disease (85/150; 56.7%), and an advanced disease stage III or IV (100/150; 66.7%).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Description of the study participants

Full size image

Spectrum of BRCA1/2 germline sequence variants

In total, 63 different heterozygous variants were identified in BRCA1 (n = 27) and BRCA2 (n = 36) among unselected Pakistani pancreatic cancer patients. Figure 2 displays representative HRM curves and corresponding DNA sequencing chromatograms for BRCA1 and BRCA2 analyses.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Representative HRM difference plots and DNA sequencing chromatograms of BRCA1/2 analysis. Normalized and temperature-shifted difference plots of the BRCA1 (a) and BRCA2 (b) showing the discrimination of positive controls and the variant-carriers (PDA 031 and PDA 121) from the wildtypes. DNA sequencing chromatograms of forward DNA strand of wildtypes (c, d), the patient PDA 031 (e) showing a BRCA1 variant (c.878C > G) and the patient PDA 121 (f) showing a BRCA2 variant (c.7948G > C) as indicated by an arrow

Full size image

Of the identified variants, five BRCA1 variants (one missense and four intronic variants) and seven BRCA2 variants (five missense, one synonymous, and one intronic variant) were novel and specific to the Pakistani population. The remaining 51 variants in BRCA1 (n = 22) and BRCA2 (n = 29) had been previously reported or described in ClinVar, LOVD, or gnomAD databases. The prevalence and allele frequencies of all identified BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants in 150 pancreatic cancer patients are detailed in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively.

Table 1 BRCA1 germline variants identified in Pakistani pancreatic cancer patients
Full size table
Table 2 BRCA2 germline variants identified in Pakistani pancreatic cancer patients
Full size table

The novel variants and previously reported VUS in BRCA1 (n = 6) and BRCA2 (n = 7) were assessed for their putative functional effects on protein or splicing using in silico meta-predictor tools and Alamut splice-site prediction tools, respectively. A novel missense variant in BRCA2 (p.Glu2650Gln) and two previously reported missense variants in BRCA1 (p.Thr293Ser) and BRCA2 (p.Ile2296Leu) were predicted as VUS. The remaining five BRCA1 variants (p.Val1740Met, c.547 + 36A > G, c.4358-61C > G, c.4675 + 80C > T, and c.5152 + 41 T > C) and five BRCA2 variants (p.Val928Asp, p.Ser1424Phe, p.Asp2438Tyr, p.Cys2636Arg, and c.1910-21A > T) were predicted as benign/likely benign (Table 3).

Table 3 In silico analyses and classification of BRCA1/2 variants
Full size table

BRCA2 pathogenic variant

A BRCA2 protein-truncating pathogenic variant (p.Asp946Ilefs*14) was detected in an unselected pancreatic cancer patient, accounting for 0.7% (1/150) prevalence in the cohort. This frameshift variant in exon 11 was identified in a 71-year-old male patient (II:2, Fig. 3) of Pathan ethnicity. He presented with grade 3 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with lymphovascular invasion and regional lymph node metastases. His brother (II:3, Fig. 3) was diagnosed with abdominal cancer of unknown primary origin. This variant was absent in 200 unaffected controls and has been previously reported as pathogenic in the ClinVar database.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Pedigree of the pancreatic cancer patient carrying a BRCA2 pathogenic variant. Index patient (PDA 098) carrying the c.2835delA variant. Circles are females, squares are males, and a diagonal slash indicates a deceased individual. Filled symbols show cancer diagnoses. Identification numbers of individuals are below the symbols. The index patient is indicated by an arrow. Double lines show consanguineous marriage. PC: pancreatic cancer. The numbers following the abbreviation indicate the age at cancer diagnosis. M+: variant carrier

Full size image

BRCA1/2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS)

A BRCA1 missense variant in exon 11, p.Thr293Ser, was detected in a 50-years-old male patient of Punjabi ethnicity. He presented with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with regional lymph node metastases. This variant was also detected in a 59-years-old unaffected female control of Punjabi ethnicity (0.5%;1/200). It has been reported with a low minor allele frequency of 0.013% (4/30,612) among South Asians in gnomAD and further described with conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity in the ClinVar database. It was predicted as pathogenic by 15 of 23 protein function prediction algorithms with VarCards damaging score of 0.65 (Table 3). This variant was predicted to fulfil ACMG/AMP variant interpretation criteria PM1, PP3, and BP1 using InterVar tool. Based on these findings, p.Thr293Ser was classified as VUS.

A BRCA2 missense variant in exon 12, p.Ile2296Leu, was identified in a 52-years-old male patient of Kashmiri ethnicity. He presented with grade 2 ampullary ductal adenocarcinoma with lymphovascular invasion and regional lymph node metastases. It was not detected in 200 healthy controls. This variant has been reported with a minor allele frequency of 0.14% (44/30,422) among South Asians in gnomAD. It has been reported with conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity in the ClinVar database. It was predicted as pathogenic by 10 of 23 protein function prediction algorithms with VarCards damaging score of 0.43 (Table 3). This variant was predicted to fulfil ACMG/AMP variant interpretation criteria PM1, PP3, and BP1 using the InterVar tool. Based on these findings, p.Ile2296Leu was categorized as VUS.

A BRCA2 missense variant in exon 17, p.Glu2650Gln, was detected in a 47-years-old female patient of Pathan ethnicity. She had a grade 2 ampullary ductal adenocarcinoma. This variant was not detected in 200 controls. This novel variant has not been reported in literature or databases (gnomAD, ClinVar, and LOVD). It was predicted as pathogenic by 20 of 23 protein function prediction algorithms with VarCards damaging score of 0.87 (Table 3). This variant was predicted to fulfil ACMG/AMP variant interpretation criteria PM1, PM2, PP3, and BP1 using the InterVar tool. Based on these findings, p.Glu2650Gln was classified as VUS.

A recurrent BRCA2 nonsense variant in exon 27, p.Lys3326Ter, was found in a 46-years-old male patient of Punjabi ethnicity and a 60-years-old female patient of Punjabi ethnicity. They presented with grade 2/3 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with perineural invasion and regional lymph node metastases. This variant was not detected in 200 healthy controls. It has been reported with a minor allele frequency of 0.693% (212/30,594) among South Asians in gnomAD. It has been reported as benign variant in the ClinVar database among breast and/or ovarian cancer patients but no functional evidence is available. Based on these findings, p.Lys3326Ter was classified as VUS for pancreatic cancer risk.

There was no significant difference (P = 0.288) observed in the age at pancreatic cancer diagnosis between VUS carriers (mean 50.4 years, range 44.7–60.1 years) and noncarriers (mean 55.2 years, range 31.2–78.4 years). Additionally, none of the VUS carriers reported a family history of pancreatic or any other cancer.

BRCA1/2 benign variants

The remaining 26 BRCA1 variants (12 missense variants, five silent alterations, and nine non-coding variants) and 32 BRCA2 variants (16 missense variants, nine silent variants, six intronic variants, and one variant in 5’UTR) were classified as benign based on in silico analyses or previously reported elsewhere or described in the ClinVar, LOVD, or gnomAD database (by August 2022) (Table 1, Table 2).

Discussion

The significance of BRCA1/2 genetic testing in pancreatic cancer patients is recently recognized among Caucasians, however, limited reports are available among Asians. This is the first comprehensive study investigating the contribution of BRCA1/2 variants to a cohort of 150 unselected and prospectively registered pancreatic cancer patients from Pakistan. A BRCA2 pathogenic variant was detected in an unselected pancreatic cancer patient (1/150; 0.7%). Previously reported frequencies of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants in unselected pancreatic cancer patients vary across different populations: 1.2% (12/1009) to 3.2% (16/499) in China [12, 25], 3.4% (34/1005) in Japan [13], 1.2% (5/417) to 6.9% (5/72) in Belgium, Czech Republic [26], Greece [27], Italy [28], UK [5], 1.5% (4/274) to 11.3% (17/151) in the USA [8,9,10,11], and 2.3% (4/177) to 4.8% (21/437) in Canada [7, 29]. These findings suggest that frequencies of pathogenic variants in genes associated with pancreatic cancer risk vary with ethnicity and geographical distribution of various populations.

A BRCA2 pathogenic variant (p.Asp946Ilefs*14) was identified in a pancreatic cancer patient with a family history of abdominal cancer. The co-segregation of this variant with abdominal cancer could not be investigated as the brother of the index patient was deceased. It was not detected in the 200 healthy controls. This frameshift variant is considered pathogenic, resulting in a non-functional protein due to premature stop codon or nonsense-mediated decay of the mRNA. It is also described as a pathogenic variant in the ClinVar database. This variant has also been reported in Greek and African-American breast cancer patients [30, 31]. Previously we reported this variant in one early-onset breast cancer patient at age 30 of Pathan ethnicity from Pakistan [17]. In the current study, a patient harbouring this variant presented with pancreatic cancer at age 71 of Pathan ethnicity from Pakistan. Similar findings have previously been reported showing that pathogenic BRCA2 variant carriers were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer at an older age compared to breast or ovarian cancer patients [32]. These findings suggest a lower penetrance of the pathogenic BRCA2 variant in pancreatic cancer patients than in breast/ovarian cancer patients.

A novel BRCA2 missense variant (p.Glu2650Gln) was identified in one pancreatic cancer patient but not detected in 200 healthy controls. This variant is present in a highly conserved oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding (OB) folds within the DNA binding domain of the BRCA2 (amino acids 2482 to 3184) in its C-terminal region. This domain is important for the interaction of BRCA2 with single stranded DNA and then anchoring RAD51 at the site of the damaged DNA for its repair [33]. This variant may reduce the homologous recombination capacity of BRCA2. Neither the literature nor the BRCA2 variant databases have reported this variant. Twenty out of 23 in silico protein function prediction tools predicted it as likely pathogenic. Based on the ACMG/AMP criteria (PM1, PM2, PP3, BP1), the variant p.Glu2650Gln is classified as a VUS.

A previously reported BRCA2 missense variant (p.Ile2296Leu) was identified in one pancreatic cancer patient but not in 200 healthy controls. This variant involved a conserved amino acid change. Previously, a minigene functional splicing assay for this variant showed a minor effect on BRCA2 exon 12 skipping [34]. Previously, it has been reported as VUS in a North Indian breast/ovarian cancer patient [35] and as a benign variant in South African breast/ovarian cancer patients [36]. Ten of 23 in silico protein function prediction tools predicted it as likely pathogenic. The allele frequency of p.Ile2296Leu was 0.14% (44/30,512) among South Asians in the gnomAD database. Conflicting interpretations for this variant have been reported in the ClinVar database. Data regarding the association of this variant with pancreatic cancer risk is lacking. Based on the current evidences, the variant p.Ile2296Leu was classified as VUS for pancreatic cancer risk.

A recurrent BRCA2 protein truncating variant (p.Lys3326Ter) was detected in two pancreatic cancer patients but not in 200 controls from Pakistan. This variant is localized at the RAD51 binding domain (residues 3265 to 3330) of BRCA2 at its C-terminal region [37]. It creates a premature stop codon, resulting in the loss of terminal 93 amino acids residues necessary for the resolution of stalled replication forks during the DNA repair activity [37]. There are conflicting interpretations related to the pathogenicity of this variant. The minor allele frequency of this variant among South Asians is 0.69% (212/30,594) in gnomAD database. It has been reported as a benign variant in the ClinVar database. However, this variant has been previously reported in association with an increased risk of breast, ovarian, and prostate cancer [38,39,40]. It has been reported with a frequency of 5.6% (8/144) to 10.3% (3/29) in familial and 2.8% (7/250) in sporadic pancreatic cancer patients from the USA [41, 42]. In a large case-control study including 2935 sporadic pancreatic cancer patients and 5626 controls, mostly of European and Asian origin, p.Lys3326Ter was reported to confer an increased pancreatic cancer risk [43]. This variant has also been reported with increased probability of developing lung cancer among smokers of European ancestry [44]. Whereas, both Pakistani pancreatic cancer patients carrying this variant were non-smokers. This variant deemed involved in pancreatic cancer pathogenesis in association with other environmental genotoxic risk factor(s). Taken together, p.Lys3326Ter is classified as a VUS for pancreatic cancer risk.

No BRCA1 protein truncating variant was detected in pancreatic cancer patients from Pakistan. This is consistent with the other reports from China [45], Japan [14], the UK [5], the USA [46], and Canada [29]. However, in this study, a previously reported BRCA1 missense variant (p.Thr293Ser) was identified in one pancreatic cancer patient and one out of 200 unaffected controls. This variant involves a well conserved nucleotide change. It has been previously reported in an ovarian cancer patient of European ancestry in The Cancer Genome Atlas and showed a neutral impact on the BRCA1 function in a cell-based homology-directed recombination assay [47]. It has been documented with conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity in the ClinVar database. Fifteen out of 23 in silico protein function prediction tools predicted it as likely pathogenic. The allele frequency of p.Thr293Ser was low among South Asians as reported in the gnomAD database (4/30,612; 0.013%). Taken together with the previous reports and our interpretations, p.Thr293Ser is classified as VUS.

In the present study, BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants were not detected in a small group of familial pancreatic cancer patients (n = 4), in agreement with other small studies from China (n = 9) [12] and Spain (n = 43) [48] and a large study from Italy (n = 282) [28]. Whereas BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants have been reported in familial pancreatic cancer patients with a prevalence of 0.8% (5/638) to 7.3% (9/124) in large studies (> 100 patients) from the USA and Canada [9, 49, 50]. These results suggest that the prevalence of pathogenic variants varies by the genetic enrichment of the study subjects, study size, ethnicity, and geographic origin of the study population. Previously, we reported a high prevalence of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (168/718; 23.4%), including 23 BRCA1 founder mutations in high-risk breast and/or ovarian cancer patients from Pakistan [16,17,18]. The breast/ovarian cancer patients included in these studies were genetically enriched and primarily selected based on family history or early age at disease presentation. Whereas unselected pancreatic cancer patients were recruited in the current study. This could explain low prevalence of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants in our study. Recently, we reported a low prevalence of PALB2 pathogenic variants (2/150; 1.3%) in a cohort of unselected pancreatic cancer patients from Pakistan [19]. These findings warrant comprehensive multigene panel testing in the Pakistani population.

Our study findings may have potential clinical implications. Tumours of pancreatic cancer patients harbouring BRCA1/2 heterozygous germline variants show a loss of heterozygosity of the functional wildtype allele and thus are sensitive to platinum agents [3, 4]. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor is another promising drug for pancreatic cancer patients harbouring BRCA1/2 pathogenic germline variants [3, 4]. Moreover, predictive genetic testing may be offered to the first-degree relatives of the pathogenic variant carrier, who have a 50% chance of carrying the same pathogenic variant. Females harbouring BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants are at increased risk of developing breast/ovarian cancer [4]. Likewise, the males carrying the BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant are at high risk of developing prostate cancer [4]. Several screening and risk-reduction strategies are available for at-risk, unaffected mutation carrier individuals.

The present study stands out for its inclusion of an unselected and prospectively enrolled cohort of pancreatic cancer patients, eliminating case-selection bias and enhancing robustness of our findings. Given the challenging prognosis associated with pancreatic cancer, conducting prospective studies on these patients is inherently difficult, making our study’s approach particularly noteworthy. However, certain limitations were observed in our study. First, we used DHPLC and HRM assays to identify BRCA1/2 sequencing candidates with a variant detection sensitivity of less than 100%. Consequently, it is conceivable that some pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants might have been missed using these methods. Nonetheless, it is important to note that positive controls for each amplicon were included in all analyses, ensuring the reliability of the results obtained. Second, comprehensive BRCA1/2 large genomic rearrangements were not assessed, which may underestimate the true variant frequencies reported in this study. Nevertheless, two large genomic rearrangements in BRCA1 (exons 1–2 deletion and exons 21–24 deletion) previously reported as founder mutations in Pakistan [18] were not identified in the current study. Third, functional assays were not performed for the likely pathogenic variants and the VUS detected in the current study, leaving an avenue for future investigations to explore the functional implications of these variants.

Conclusions

This is the first comprehensive study investigating the contribution of BRCA1/2 germline variants to unselected pancreatic cancer patients from Pakistan. Pathogenic variant was exclusively identified in BRCA2 (0.7%; 1/150). Additionally, five cases were identified as VUS carriers in BRCA1 (n = 1) and BRCA2 (n = 4). These findings suggest a marginal contribution of BRCA1/2 germline variants to pancreatic cancer risk in the Pakistani population. Genetic testing using multigene panels is recommended for a better understanding of genetic susceptibility in pancreatic cancer patients from Pakistan.

Abbreviations

5’UTR:

Five prime untranslated region

ACMG:

American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics

AMP:

Association for Molecular Pathology

BRCA1 :

Breast Cancer gene 1

BRCA2 :

Breast Cancer gene 2

BRCT:

BRCA1 C-terminal

BRIP1:

BRCA1 interacting protein 1

DHPLC:

Denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

gnomAD:

Genome Aggregation Database

HRM:

High resolution melting

LOVD:

Leiden open variant database

PALB2 :

Partner and localizer of BRCA2

PathoMAN:

Pathogenicity of Mutation Analyzer

SKMCH&RC:

Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre

VUS:

Variants of uncertain significance

References

  1. Rawla P, Sunkara T, Gaduputi V. Epidemiology of pancreatic Cancer: global trends, etiology and risk factors. World. J Oncol. 2019;10(1):10–27. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.14740/wjon1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Global Cancer Observatory 2020. Date accessed November 15, 2022 [https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/586-pakistan-fact-sheets.pdf].

  3. Devico Marciano N, Kroening G, Dayyani F. BRCA-mutated pancreatic Cancer: from discovery to novel treatment paradigms. Cancers. 2022;14(10):2453. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14102453.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kasuga A, Okamoto T, Udagawa S, Mori C, Mie T, Furukawa T, et al. Molecular features and clinical Management of Hereditary Pancreatic Cancer Syndromes and Familial Pancreatic Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(3) https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms23031205.

  5. Astiazaran-Symonds E, Kim J. A genome-first approach to estimate prevalence of germline pathogenic variants and risk of pancreatic Cancer in select Cancer susceptibility genes. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(13):3257. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14133257.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Li S, Silvestri V, Leslie G, Rebbeck TR, Neuhausen SL, Hopper JL, et al. Cancer risks associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(14):1529–41. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1200/jco.21.02112.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith AL, Wong C, Cuggia A, Borgida A, Holter S, Hall A, et al. Reflex testing for germline BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, and ATM mutations in pancreatic Cancer: mutation prevalence and clinical outcomes from two Canadian research registries. JCO Precis Oncol. 2018;2:1–16. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1200/po.17.00098.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chittenden A, Haraldsdottir S, Ukaegbu C, Underhill-Blazey M, Gaonkar S, Uno H, et al. Implementing systematic genetic counseling and multigene germline testing for individuals with pancreatic Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021;17(2):e236–47. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1200/op.20.00678.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hu C, Hart SN, Polley EC, Gnanaolivu R, Shimelis H, Lee KY, et al. Association between inherited germline mutations in Cancer predisposition genes and risk of pancreatic Cancer. JAMA. 2018;319(23):2401–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1001/jama.2018.6228.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Salo-Mullen EE, O'Reilly EM, Kelsen DP, Ashraf AM, Lowery MA, Yu KH, et al. Identification of germline genetic mutations in patients with pancreatic cancer. Cancer. 2015;121(24):4382–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1002/cncr.29664.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shindo K, Yu J, Suenaga M, Fesharakizadeh S, Cho C, Macgregor-Das A, et al. Deleterious germline mutations in patients with apparently sporadic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(30):3382–90. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1200/jco.2017.72.3502.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yin L, Wei J, Lu Z, Huang S, Gao H, Chen J, et al. Prevalence of germline sequence variations among patients with pancreatic Cancer in China. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(2):e2148721. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48721.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Mizukami K, Iwasaki Y, Kawakami E, Hirata M, Kamatani Y, Matsuda K, et al. Genetic characterization of pancreatic cancer patients and prediction of carrier status of germline pathogenic variants in cancer-predisposing genes. EBioMedicine. 2020;60:103033. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.103033.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Takeuchi S, Doi M, Ikari N, Yamamoto M, Furukawa T. Mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2, and a panel of 50 cancer-associated genes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):8105. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1038/s41598-018-26526-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee K, Yoo C, Kim KP, Park KJ, Chang HM, Kim TW, et al. Germline BRCA mutations in Asian patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a prospective study evaluating risk category for genetic testing. Investig New Drugs. 2018;36(1):163–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s10637-017-0497-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rashid MU, Zaidi A, Torres D, Sultan F, Benner A, Naqvi B, et al. Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Pakistani breast and ovarian cancer patients. Int J Cancer. 2006;119(12):2832–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1002/ijc.22269.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rashid MU, Muhammad N, Naeemi H, Khan FA, Hassan M, Faisal S, et al. Spectrum and prevalence of BRCA1/2 germline mutations in Pakistani breast cancer patients: results from a large comprehensive study. Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2019;17:27. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13053-019-0125-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Rashid MU, Muhammad N, Naeemi H, Shehzad U, Hamann U. Chasing the origin of 23 recurrent BRCA1 mutations in Pakistani breast and ovarian cancer patients. Int J Cancer. 2022;151(3):402–11. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1002/ijc.34016.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Muhammad N, Sadaqat R, Naeemi H, Masood I, Hassan U, Ijaz B, et al. Contribution of germline PALB2 variants to an unselected and prospectively registered pancreatic cancer patient cohort in Pakistan. HPB (Oxford). 2022;24(12):2134–44. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.hpb.2022.09.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rashid MU, Muhammad N, Amin A, Loya A, Hamann U. Contribution of BRCA1 large genomic rearrangements to early-onset and familial breast/ovarian cancer in Pakistan. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;161(2):191–201. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s10549-016-4044-0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Li J, Shi L, Zhang K, Zhang Y, Hu S, Zhao T, et al. VarCards: an integrated genetic and clinical database for coding variants in the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(D1):D1039–d1048. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/nar/gkx1039.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405–24. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1038/gim.2015.30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Joseph V, Ravichandran V, Offit K. Pathogenicity of mutation analyzer (PathoMAN): a fast automation of germline genomic variant curation in clinical sequencing. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(15_suppl):1529-1529. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.1529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li Q, Wang K. InterVar: clinical interpretation of genetic variants by the 2015 ACMG-AMP guidelines. Am J Hum Genet. 2017;100(2):267–80. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.01.004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhao Z, Li X. Pathogenic genomic alterations in Chinese pancreatic cancer patients and their therapeutical implications. Cancer Med. 2023;12(10):11672–85. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1002/cam4.5871.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wieme G, Kral J, Rosseel T. Prevalence of germline pathogenic variants in Cancer predisposing genes in Czech and Belgian pancreatic Cancer patients. Cancers. 2021;13(17):4430. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers13174430.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Fountzilas E, Eliades A. Clinical significance of germline Cancer predisposing variants in unselected patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(2):198. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers13020198.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Peretti U, Cavaliere A, Niger M, Tortora G, Di Marco MC, Rodriquenz MG, et al. Germinal BRCA1-2 pathogenic variants (gBRCA1-2pv) and pancreatic cancer: epidemiology of an Italian patient cohort. ESMO Open. 2021;6(1):100032. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.esmoop.2020.100032.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cremin C, Lee MK. Burden of hereditary cancer susceptibility in unselected patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma referred for germline screening. Cancer Med. 2020;9(11):4004–13. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1002/cam4.2973.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Armakolas A, Ladopoulou A, Konstantopoulou I, Pararas B, Gomatos IP, Kataki A, et al. BRCA2 gene mutations in Greek patients with familial breast cancer. Hum Mutat. 2002;19(1):81–2. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1002/humu.9003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Purrington KS, Raychaudhuri S. Heritable susceptibility to breast Cancer among African-American women in the Detroit research on Cancer survivors study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2020;29(11):2369–75. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0564.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cavanagh H, Rogers KM. The role of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in prostate, pancreatic and stomach cancers. Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2015;13(1):16. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13053-015-0038-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Fradet-Turcotte A, Sitz J, Grapton D, Orthwein A. BRCA2 functions: from DNA repair to replication fork stabilization. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2016;23(10):T1–t17. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1530/erc-16-0297.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Meulemans L, Mesman RLS. Skipping nonsense to maintain function: the paradigm of BRCA2 exon 12. Cancer Res. 2020;80(7):1374–86. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1158/0008-5472.can-19-2491.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Mehta A, Vasudevan S, Sharma SK, Kumar D, Panigrahi M, Suryavanshi M, et al. Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 deleterious mutations and variants of unknown clinical significance associated with breast/ovarian cancer: a report from North India. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:6505–16. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.2147/cmar.s186563.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Van der Merwe NC, Combrink HM, Ntaita KS, Oosthuizen J. Prevalence of clinically relevant germline BRCA variants in a large unselected south African breast and ovarian Cancer cohort: a public sector experience. Front Genet. 2022;13:834265. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3389/fgene.2022.834265.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Baughan S, Tainsky MA. K3326X and other C-terminal BRCA2 variants implicated in hereditary Cancer syndromes: a review. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(3):447. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers13030447.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Meeks HD, Song H, Michailidou K, Bolla MK, Dennis J, Wang Q, et al. BRCA2 polymorphic stop codon K3326X and the risk of breast, prostate, and ovarian cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016;108(2) https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/jnci/djv315.

  39. Stafford JL, Dyson G, Levin NK, Chaudhry S, Rosati R, Kalpage H, et al. Reanalysis of BRCA1/2 negative high risk ovarian cancer patients reveals novel germline risk loci and insights into missing heritability. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0178450. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1371/journal.pone.0178450.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Thompson ER, Gorringe KL, Rowley SM, Li N, McInerny S, Wong-Brown MW, et al. Reevaluation of the BRCA2 truncating allele c.9976A > T (p.Lys3326Ter) in a familial breast cancer context. Sci Rep. 2015;5:14800. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1038/srep14800.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Martin ST, Matsubayashi H, Rogers CD, Philips J, Couch FJ, Brune K, et al. Increased prevalence of the BRCA2 polymorphic stop codon K3326X among individuals with familial pancreatic cancer. Oncogene. 2005;24(22):3652–6. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1038/sj.onc.1208411.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Murphy KM, Brune KA, Griffin C, Sollenberger JE, Petersen GM, Bansal R, et al. Evaluation of candidate genes MAP2K4, MADH4, ACVR1B, and BRCA2 in familial pancreatic cancer: deleterious BRCA2 mutations in 17%. Cancer Res. 2002;62(13):3789–93.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Obazee O, Archibugi L, Andriulli A, Soucek P, Małecka-Panas E, Ivanauskas A, et al. Germline BRCA2 K3326X and CHEK2 I157T mutations increase risk for sporadic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2019;145(3):686–93. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1002/ijc.32127.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang Y, McKay JD, Rafnar T, Wang Z, Timofeeva MN, Broderick P, et al. Rare variants of large effect in BRCA2 and CHEK2 affect risk of lung cancer. Nat Genet. 2014;46(7):736–41. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1038/ng.3002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Jiang H, Huang F. Germline mutations in homologous recombination repair genes among Chinese pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients detected using next-generation sequencing. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2023;11(7):e2170. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1002/mgg3.2170.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Koptiuch C, Espinel WF, Kohlmann WK, Zhao J, Kaphingst KA. Implications of multigene panel testing on psychosocial outcomes: a comparison of patients with pancreatic and breast or ovarian Cancer. JCO Precis Oncol. 2021;5 https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1200/po.20.00199.

  47. Lu C, Xie M, Wendl MC, Wang J, McLellan MD, Leiserson MD, et al. Patterns and functional implications of rare germline variants across 12 cancer types. Nat Commun. 2015;6:10086. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1038/ncomms10086.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Earl J, Galindo-Pumariño C, Encinas J, Barreto E, Castillo ME, Pachón V, et al. A comprehensive analysis of candidate genes in familial pancreatic cancer families reveals a high frequency of potentially pathogenic germline variants. EBioMedicine. 2020;53:102675. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102675.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Dudley B, Karloski E, Monzon FA, Singhi AD. Germline mutation prevalence in individuals with pancreatic cancer and a history of previous malignancy. Cancer. 2018;124(8):1691–700. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1002/cncr.31242.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Roberts NJ, Norris AL, Petersen GM, Bondy ML, Brand R, Gallinger S, et al. Whole genome sequencing defines the genetic heterogeneity of familial pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Discov. 2016;6(2):166–75. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1158/2159-8290.cd-15-0402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all study subjects for their participation. We thank Irfan Ahmed for the critical reading of the manuscript. We thank Syed Irfan Kabir, Maria Qubtia, and Neelma from SKMCH&RC, Peshawar, Pakistan for their help in the recruitment of study participants.

Availability of data and material

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Funding

This study utilized resources and support from SKMCH&RC, Lahore, Pakistan. The funder had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data or writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Basic Sciences Research, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre (SKMCH&RC), Lahore, Pakistan

    Noor Muhammad, Ayesha Azeem, Shumaila Arif, Humaira Naeemi & Muhammad Usman Rashid

  2. Laboratory of Applied and Functional Genomics, National Center of Excellence in Molecular Biology, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan

    Noor Muhammad & Bushra Ijaz

  3. Clinical Research Office, SKMCH&RC, Lahore, Pakistan

    Iqra Masood

  4. Department of Pathology, SKMCH&RC, Lahore, Pakistan

    Usman Hassan

  5. Department of Surgical Oncology, SKMCH&RC, Lahore, Pakistan

    Faisal Hanif & Aamir Ali Syed

  6. Centre for Liver and Biliary Sciences, Bahria International Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan

    Faisal Hanif

  7. Department of Internal Medicine, SKMCH&RC, Lahore, Pakistan

    Muhammed Aasim Yusuf

Authors
  1. Noor Muhammad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ayesha Azeem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shumaila Arif
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Humaira Naeemi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Iqra Masood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Usman Hassan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Bushra Ijaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Faisal Hanif
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Aamir Ali Syed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Muhammed Aasim Yusuf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Muhammad Usman Rashid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

IM, HN: enrollment of study participants and data acquisition. NM, AA, SA: data acquisition and molecular analyses. FH, AAS, MAY: expert surgeons and gastroenterologist, identification of eligible patients and provided relevant intellectual input. UH: served as expert histopathologist and reviewed pathological data. BI: data acquisition and anlaysis. NM, MUR: study concept and design, enrollment of study participants, data acquisition, data interpretation, statistical analysis, and manuscript drafting. MUR: study supervision. This manuscript is a part of the Ph.D. thesis submitted by NM to the University of the Punjab, Lahore and it has been archived at Higher Education Commission of Pakistan. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Usman Rashid.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of SKMCH&RC (IRB approval number IRB-16-14, date December 16, 2016). Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muhammad, N., Azeem, A., Arif, S. et al. Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline variants in an unselected pancreatic cancer patient cohort in Pakistan. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 21, 22 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13053-023-00269-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13053-023-00269-x

Keywords

Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice

ISSN: 1897-4287